Carbon removals are activities aimed at removing carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the atmosphere and storing it durably in natural or technological reservoirs, thereby contributing to climate change mitigation.
Unlike emission reductions, which focus on decreasing the amount of greenhouse gases generated, removals capture CO₂ that has already been emitted. They are a key pillar of climate neutrality and net zero strategies, particularly for addressing the residual emissions that are hardest to eliminate.
There are two main categories:
These are closely linked to the concept of carbon sinks and nature-based solutions.
The quality of a removal depends on factors such as storage permanence, additionality, verifiability and the risk of reversal.
In Europe, carbon removals are gaining importance within sustainability frameworks and voluntary carbon markets. The European Union has adopted the Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming Certification Framework (CRCF) to establish common quality and transparency criteria. Standards such as the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard also set rules on how removals may be used towards net-zero claims.
Without accurate carbon footprint measurement and a clear reduction strategy, removals should not replace decarbonisation, they are meant to complement it. Understanding the difference between reduction, offsetting and removal is essential to meet international standards and anticipate future requirements. At Manglai we help companies measure their carbon footprint and prepare their sustainability reporting. Discover how Manglai can help you.
Regulatory updates and product news, once a month.
Companies that trust us
Carbon sinks are natural or artificial systems that absorb and store more carbon dioxide than they emit, such as forests, oceans and soils, helping to offset emissions and slow climate change.
Carbon storage is the process of capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) and keeping it out of the atmosphere for a long period, in natural ecosystems such as forests or soils, or through technological solutions such as geological storage.
The ecological footprint compares humanity's demand for natural resources with the planet's biocapacity, expressed in global hectares. It is a broader measure than the carbon footprint alone.